Pages

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

robo vs 175 crs!!!! who will win




Bollywood in the last couple of years has been obsessed with figures (of the numerical kind). Trumpets have been blared and headlines sought over escalating film acquisition prices and exorbitant star remunerations . But even though the Indian motion picture business has seen some really outrageous acquisitions like Raavan (Rs 125 crore reportedly ) and Kites (rumoured to be Rs 120 crore), the production budgets have so far remained modest.




Now, however, a new figure has emerged: a mindboggling Rs 150 crore, which is said to be the budget for the Rajinikanth-Aishwarya Rai Bachchan bilingual Endhiran (Tamil) and The Robot (Hindi). Produced by Kalanidhi Maran, the film is touted as India’s most expensive film to date.



In the making for over two years, The Robot has been shot on hitherto-unseen locations that include the world heritage site Machu Picchu (Peru) besides Brazil and the US, with a foreign crew that includes costume designer E Vogt and stunt coordinator Yuen Woo Ping.



Trade insiders say the production budget is more than double the previously most expensive Bollywood action adventure Blue (pegged at Rs 75 crore) because 40% of the cost has gone into special effects.



This science fiction entertainer with a sweeping canvas has animatronics, used before in Hollywood magnum opuses like Jurassic Park, Terminator and Avatar, carried out at the Stan Winston Studios . The grapevine says that Tamil Nadu demigod Rajinikanth’s price could reportedly be Rs 45 crore (or a share in the profits coming to the same amount) and his heroine has reportedly been paid Rs 6 crore.



A trade insider said: ‘‘ Robot is the first film with such a huge production cost. This is not an acquisition figure like in the case of Kites or Raavan but the actual landing cost, including the remuneration of the two lead actors.’’ Director S Shankar justified the budget, saying: ‘‘ It’s a complete entertainer with the best special effects seen so far on the Indian screen. We realise that we have made the costliest Indian film but when it’s Rajinikanth and Aishwarya, it is justified.’’



Though Robot might well have, few Indian films can justify their humongous cost of production. ‘‘ Bollywood has rarely made films on a huge canvas,’’ says trade analyst Taran Adarsh. ‘‘ In most cases film budgets have gone through the roof because actors in India take away nearly 70% of the budget as their remuneration.’’ A case in point is Blue, the previously most expensive film before The Robot, where Akshay Kumar reportedly got Rs 27 crore as his price, Sanjay Dutt got Rs 9 crore and even actors like Lara Dutta and Zayed Khan took home eightfigure salaries.



But there have been films where the cost has shot up because of other factors. Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Devdas (2002) budget came to Rs 50 crore because, as an industry insider said, ‘‘ Devdas was shot for nearly 250 shifts; it cost the producer so much because they had erected six sets, each costing anywhere between Rs 3 crore and Rs 12 crore. And the sets stood at Film City for a period of two and a half years. Paro’s glass room__ made from more than 1 lakh pieces of stained glass__ became a talking point in Bollywood.’’



Some other producers who genuinely spent money on production as opposed to paying their actors ridiculous fees were K Asif (his evergreen historical love story , Mughal-e-Azam , took nine years and cost Rs 12 crore in 1960), Kamal Amrohi , whose Razia Sultan cost around Rs 23 crore in 1983 and Yash Chopra, whose action thriller Dhoom-2 was made for Rs 55 crore.

No comments:

Post a Comment